I don't get this. Everybody (except for Andy) said he had pancreatic cancer. What is the problem with showing something from his doctor that says that too? On the other hand, if they are giving out information if you provide proof of donation, I just may have to send Andy a buck or two.
One of the interesting things is a back-tracking on a minor item--when the matter of the fund-raising taking place on so many web-sites occurred, the dirty ben dismissed them as just "little" web-sites, insinuating they were worthless for raising bucks.
Okay; I always thought so, I always thought the Andyites raised less than they alleged they raised--but that was a minority opinion, and I usually live life under the knowledge that others know more than I do, about such things.
But regardless of how much was raised, whether a lot or only a little, this sudden backtracking looks auspicious.
It is so obvious it is funny. Andy won't say it because then he could be prosecuted. The FOA have said it, so they need cover. If Andy ever posts the diagnosis and it reveals that he knew he didn't have 'pancreatic cancer' and allowed the FOA to collect money under false pretenses, all hell will break loose.
I firmly believe that there are two groups in the FOA camp. Some who knew beyond a doubt that it wasn't pancreatic cancer but didn't care and didn't see the consequences, and some who were told (WilArmPit for example) it was pancreatic cancer by Andy or AndyBots. Both groups now desperately want this to go away. Some because they see jail bars in the future, and some who don't want their reputations damaged.