BTW, when you originally posted it, I thought this was the one you were unsure of the title, and said 'train', so I thought maybe I was looking down a train platform. But clearly, the Kool-Aid Man (below) can be spotted enjoying the performance in the upper left portion of the scene.
Yes, it is a bit "trite and pedestrian." And that's exactly what the more adventurous artists react against.
I'm sure that many modern artists would be willing to forgive my realistic/representational approach, if I showed Christ being sodomized with a chainsaw, or something.
Now, to show I'm not a complete reactionary, I'll give an example of someone modern who often uses what looks like formless blobs of paint, but can actually produce worthwhile art with them: Chuck Close. His work takes real effort & talent, because it matters what the final product looks like when seen from a distance. (Sort of pointilism on a macro scale, I guess?)
I have to say that I don't like Chuck Close too much. I find imitation of photography unworthy of a painter, even if embellished with clever patterns or enlarged out of all proportion.
OTOH, I like your rose quite well.