Replies

The Andyites made the claims (the round red one has pancreatic cancer, the round red one needs money), not the other side--and so it is up to the Andyites to prove those claims, not for us to disprove them.

They have a severe difficulty with that idea.

Also, comprehending that Andy made himself and his prognosis a public concern when he asked for donations. Demanding to know the identity of those asking questions is a smokescreen. Saying the public has no right to answers is completely wrong.

One poster, while refusing to answer the 3 questions claimed the entire process had been transparent. Clear cognitive dissonance.

Finally, the seemingly clear-thinking poster near the end admits every single one of our concerns is legitimate and that Andy has given the impression of shenanigans and should provide the information in order to end the situation, and yet persists in calling the questioners "trolls." "Truthseekers." Ha.

One of the things that amuses me is how the Andyite richboy insists scamdy.com is "all FReepers," when in stark fact scamdy.com is more diverse than the Andyites.

Scamdy.com and the DUmmie FUnnies have the confidence of several members of democraticunderground, all but one of them long-time members (around at least as long as the DUmmiette sfexpat2000, that cartoon-character guy, and the red round one)--making both places more "ideologically diverse" than the Andyites.

Those individuals working on this, since this scam was first divulged the evening of April 28, have included whites, blacks, Asians; housewives and retired military personnel; affluent and not affluent; straights and gays; teenagers and old fogies; engineers and truck drivers; cops and ministers.....

.....which is much more diverse than the Andyites, whose most-prominent members are simply rich white middle-ageds with the temperament of kids.