I know how you feel about this, but the truth is that the jurors are given a specific list of instructions that they must abide by. This was not an open and shut case. It was full of flaws. They can't convict him based on anything but the facts in this case and I am really surprised that people here are calling the jurors names and saying they're stupid. They're just like you and me. Put in an absurd situation and trying to do the best they can. This is why we need professional jurors. I mean, if we are all entitled to jury of our peers, who should have been on this jury? I don't know why everyone is so surprised.
I lay the blame at the prosecution's feet. The jury did their job.