[dixie sass]

The latest "shibboleth" in a long stream of "shibboleths" or in other words labeling seems to be the "Religious Right Wing" and "those who would make this a Theocracy".

I don't want a Theocracy, do you? After all, all you have to do is look to the middle east to see what happens when you become one.

[secret garden]

Theocracy? Here? It will never happen, but if I had to pick a team, I'd have to go with the Religious Right Wing. A++

[Robert A Cook PE]

I don't want a Theocracy, do you? After all, all you have to do is look to the middle east to see what happens when you become one.

An immoral left-wing "mono-liberacracy" is much more to fear.

The "moral" right wing (as an object to be feared!) is entirely a false construction, a projection of what THEY seriously intend on doing upon regaining power. A morally-guided force, no matter its power, can NEVER be oppressive, because it IS (by definition) bounded and governed by the rule of law, but MOST IMPORTANT, it is bounded by the rule of "Law" by men (and women) who respect and fear an almighty God.

An bounded liberacracy, on the other hand, changes the "law" to suit their goals, which is eternal power in their own immoral hands. They fear no one, no thing, other than Liberty - in the hands of an armed and educated citizen.)

In Hillary's FBI, for example, the head of her anti-terrorism task force in the months before 2000, said what he specifically feared most was "armed right wing extremists", especially those organized "under churches" against the government.

These, of course, were the very months that the armed left extremist (Muslims) were ACTUALLY IN the US planning their attacks on 9/11.

The whole "anti-terror" claims of the Clinton followers are false, completely fake to hide their military-stype assaults such as in Waco and Montana and California and in Florida AGAINST gun owners and those Christians who opposed the Clinton's crimes.

This, of course, combined with her use of the IRS and BATF to remove "right wing" opponents.