[the_Watchman]

Perhaps the original LA times post did refer to "fewer" and "5%". However, in that case, the Times chose to pull it. Cause it isn't there now!

[Doofer]

Perhaps the original LA times post did refer to "fewer" and "5%". However, in that case, the Times chose to pull it. Cause it isn't there now!

But it can be found here.

here!

So it looks like the LA Times did retract that portion of the story but the Seattle Times is still running the original.