You responded to a point being made with an adhominum. I did'nt see you attacked. I saw cops in general attacked based on an actual case where 80% of retiring chiefs were claiming disability (working the system to the point of debatable fraud). Inferences were made about the general ethical standards of police.
You choose to respond by ignoring the point and threatinging to make the poster 'squeel like a pig' or something like that.
So tell us are you a cop? Do you feel personally attacked by a general attack on cops ethics? Your response was ironic in that it made you look like a jack boot who certainly should'nt be a cop. (You are more then that response of course, but if that was all I had to go on I'd say you were part of the problem, assuming you're a cop.)
BTW the CHP disability abuse was a series of storys on SJ mercury news. Was discussed on FR. Search and Google are your friends.
I am certain that with all those "Police officers suck" bumpersickers all over your car, you will be FR front page news when you shoot it out with your arch enemies.
I know I'll be looking forward to a comment or two on that thread.