Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh
It's AGAINST THE LAW to have a stripper perform for a minor.

My comment directly referred to morality, not the law. People have a legal right, in many cases even a duty, to disobey immoral statutes. In this particular case, the parents are charged with "contributing to the delinquency of a minor and involving a minor in obscene acts." What delinquency? What obscene acts? It is the so called law in this case which is delinquent and obscene. If their is any justice here, the entire case as well as the statute, will get tossed out as being grossly unconstitutional.

Just because the mother may not have been gifted with the looks that other women have, is hardly grounds to discredit her for practicing a little envy avoidance by hiring the ugliest stripper she could find. The mother may have been born that way due to no fault of her own, and thereby should be commended for having the common sense to hire a stripper uglier than herself, if envy be a problem she's having trouble dealing with.

70 posted on 05/29/2005 3:10:48 PM PDT by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: jackbob
I know you won't want to hear this but it's true.

Laws DO legislate morality.

So,

"My comment directly referred to morality, not the law."

Moral people don't want minors to indulge in this stuff.

As for her specualted looks ... who knows what she looks like. What I do know is that she does NOT think much of herself or other women. I doubt that she is a very happy camper. She reduced herself indirectly to s smutty lust object.
71 posted on 05/29/2005 5:12:35 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson