Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Goodgirlinred; Gunrunner2
It depends.

The dog was flat out the Gormont's property, that rescue worker is a nut and a thief.

I can sympathize when an animal is abused, that is a case for rescue. (there are laws in most counties). BUt this dog clearly was not being abused.

She stole that dog, and she was clearly being a vindictive bitch (pun intended) in deciding what was "right"care in her mind, not what the owners think.

14 posted on 05/22/2005 9:56:03 PM PDT by kstewskis ("Lord, let me not be deceived..." ks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: kstewskis

Well, as I said, the home needed to be checked out. The dog had to be checked over by a vet. "He was a mess," she said. Was he? Also, had the owners reported their dog missing? I don't remember that being in the report. One would think that a family who loved their dog would have reported their dog missing.

However, this should have been settled without it having had to go to court. I agree.


15 posted on 05/22/2005 10:01:28 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson