Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Elvina
U&J will just be a publicity blip, Romber would be a storm.

Maybe. But it could have played either way, with better press for Romber had they won.

Over the last few weeks, I've noticed that entertainment writers, fed by the show's PR people who already knew who won, were ALL writing negative things about Romber. (Earlier it was 50-50) That translated into more viewers, but also set up expectations for U&J, the "nice" people, to win and for the "rotten" people to lose.

I was a huge Romber fan, and noted the negative turn with great dismay. It seemed predictive. Boo hiss once again to the media for dumping on talented, bright, great-looking Romber and to the TAR editors who showed them in the worst possible light. If anyone believes that they were the only team badmouthing the competition, I have a nice bridge for sale. Truth is, the other teams hated them from the start of the race because they didn't "deserve" to be in the race.

38 posted on 05/11/2005 11:34:18 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions Freely Dispensed as Advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Veto!
That translated into more viewers, but also set up expectations for U&J, the "nice" people, to win and for the "rotten" people to lose.

Good point! I hadn't really thought about it from that perspective because I like Rob and Amber. Funny how once again the competetive, strong players are hated, while the "nice" pc underdogs are lionized. Kind of like America in general. Romber represents the capitalist ideal.

40 posted on 05/11/2005 11:53:50 AM PDT by Elvina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson