Posted on 04/28/2005 2:34:44 PM PDT by Asphalt
The phone probably broke when it hit the floor. No one is denying that he threw the phone.
It was his house as well as Martin's house. They lived together remember?
He called her bad names? OMG, he should have been hung at dusk.
Please, that is a way of life for that sort of lifestyle. We all know what sort of a neighborhood he grew up in.
He pulled the ring off her finger according to the police report but it doesn't actually say it hurt her. There is no mention of any sort of injury to the girl at all in fact.
No bruises, no abrasions. NOTHING.
Yep, he said he was going to take their son. HE HAS CUSTODY OF THE CHILD NOW.
MS. MARTIN ALSO WROTE A LETTER TO THE COURT IN SUPPORT OF SCOTT.
SHE DOESN'T SOUND ALL THAT TERRIFIED TO ME.
I wonder what she was doing that caused him to get custody? Maybe she was doing that in front of the baby and that's why he wanted the baby away from her.
We can probably at least agree that she is not mother of the year material.
Scott acknowledges the role of Christ in his life. He not only did what he was ordered to do by the court, he got himself together and is now a state corrections officer with custody of his child.
Bo committed a felony. He was arrested TWICE for drug usage. This was fairly recent. He may or may not be clean now.
Scott was not convicted of assault. He pled no contest to DISORDERLY CONDUCT.
If you are willing to give Bo a pass for committing a felony, just because he goes to church now, then Scott should get at least that.
Scott goes to Church also. Scott has custody of his son. Scott has a good job.
Bo is a 30 year old rocker with a drug habit.
Bo's felony bust was 4 years ago - his most recent, the pot bust - was 2 years ago. You either have a reading comprehension problem, or you are deliberately lying about Bo's situation in order to defend Scott. Why can't you accept that BOTH of them may have turned their lives around? It doesn't have to be one or the other! I understand your bitterness concerning your brother's situation, but that has nothing to do with Bo.
I have no bitterness towards Bo. What I am really ticked off about are the hypocritical jerks who have been tearing Scott apart but immediately excused Bo.
I don't care if Bo wins personally. I just hate the fact that we have freepers who don't want to give Scott the same credit for turning his life around.
It's WRONG.
And I have lied about NOTHING AND HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE ME OF THAT?
The fact is, Bo has just wrapped this whole thing up only MONTHS ago. Scott's situation was resolved YEARS ago.
There are no untruths there.
I'm not the one who has trouble accepting that they both have turned their lives around. I have said as much, but you don't seem to want to acknowledge that.
Acknowledging BOTH of them is what I have been trying to get others to do.
But there are lots of hypocrites who don't want to do that.
The person that my posts were directed to that you seem to think are so harsh, has been the very worst Scott basher on the live thread.
He has been beyond hateful about Scott. That is why there is so much of my energy directed towards that particular poster. That was also the latest post in a series of posts back and forth with that poster.
I don't go off on someone without reason. You don't seem to have the same restraint.
One last thing. I have no bitterness about my brother's situation. He did that to himself.
It has nothing to do with me. Because of the behaviors that are common to most addicts, I have kept my distance from my brother for a long time.
One final time, my problem is the hypocrites.
So you are making a big deal out of the fact that I got it backwards about WHICH DRUG he got arrested for
FIRST?
Is that your silly little issue and why you thought it would be appropriate to call me a liar?
For heaven's sake. That is pretty petty.
Okay, so I got the drug wrong. Big deal. But I didn't get it wrong that he was arrested twice for drugs. You are calling me a liar based on the fact that I got the cocaine and pot backwards?
The fact is, Bo did drugs. Bo got arrested for drugs. Bo's plea of guilty was only 4 months ago. I'm very clear on the fact that the arrest was in 2003.
If you are so interested in what I have to say, then you need to go back and find out that I told Xenalyte that the arrest was in 2003.
Just do it.
That is why I said his case was more recent. Look, both of Bo's cases were more recent that Scott's.
Freepers that are willing to excuse Bo but not Scott are nothing but hypocrites.
Don't you dare call me a liar again. I'm really getting angry with you.
There is no basis for that. Read all of my damn posts and you will get the entire picture.
Are you one of the hypocrites too and that's why you think you are going to try and label me a liar?
I decided to go ahead and post the link where I told Xenalyte when his last arrest was, because I figure you won't bother to verify my account.
Here it is.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1393158/posts?page=106#106
Somehow I doubt that I will get an apology from you for calling me a liar, when clearly I did no such thing.
I will apologize for suggesting that you might be lying; apparently you were merely mistaken. However, you should be clear on your facts before SHOUTING THEM OUT on a public message board.
Like I said before, I wish both of them the best and I hope they both have a great career in music. But what's good for one, should be good for all.
Indeed. He's their DAWG. It's been clear for weeks upon weeks they judges desire a Bo-Carrie faceoff in the finale.
How did I miss this?!
So did "the nose like a vacuum" Bill Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.