Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen


The actual effectiveness of Terri's swallowing, her actual ability to take in sufficient hydration and nutrition by natural means, is irrelevant to the fact that Greer had no legal standing to prohibit natural means, only "medical" or "artificial" treatment.


He had no right to prohibit food and water by natural means, since Florida law did not give him authority over spoons and ice chips, only over tubes and medications.

He broke Florida law and should be prosecuted and tried for breaking that law.


508 posted on 04/24/2005 8:55:09 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]


To: hocndoc
"Greer had no legal standing to prohibit natural means"

He had the authority to reject an "experimental therapeutic procedure", which is how the oral hydration and nutrition motion read.

Oh, you weren't aware of that? You didn't know about that motion? You haven't seen those documents? You were unaware of the controversy?

Of course you knew. But that doesn't stop you from acting ignorant and posting that "Judge Greer had no authority and should be prosecuted", does it?

Do you see what I mean about the lies and distortions by your side?

511 posted on 04/24/2005 10:05:31 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson