Didn't see lies or distortions from the physician toward whom you were responding fervently with agitated emotions.
Instead, I saw reasoned, cogent discussion based on medical experience from the doctor.
Terri Schiavo failed swallow tests in 1991, 1992, and 1993, a three year period of time in which she was receiving "swallow therapy".
Why would anyone assume, much less state as fact, that Terri could handle oral hydration and nutrition 12 years after (ineffective) swallow therapy was discontinued?
Why would anyone call for the prosecution and punishment of a sitting judge who refused such oral hydration and nourishment as an "experimental therapeutic procedure"?
To say that Terri could have handled enough oral nourishment in 2005 to survive is a lie. I asked the poster three times to support that statement and was met with silence.