I posted my comment and let the thread. I didn't hang around until post 17. Did you stop think about why the poster at 17 brought up the same thing I mentioned?
Because both were listed when the article was initially posted. IIRC, WND was listed as the source link at the heading. It appears to have been altered by the mod.
Yes, I have heard all about DeLay. I don't think he did anything wrong either, that's why I don't think Santorum is selling him out.
So, DeLay shouldn't mind answering questions. But if he was doing something wrong that would need to come out.
Huh? You were too around. You posted #5, and then again on #18. He first posted about WND on post #17, and the reason he posted it is because he was just mentioning that WND covered the story too. It was NOT posted on the original article.
Because both were listed when the article was initially posted. IIRC, WND was listed as the source link at the heading. It appears to have been altered by the mod.
No, it was NOT changed by the mods. There was no reason for them to change it. It was a vanity and it still is. It is the way he originally posted it. You need to go back and read the article again.
Yes, I have heard all about DeLay. I don't think he did anything wrong either, that's why I don't think Santorum is selling him out.
When someone questions your ethics, they are questioning your honesty. That is about as big a slap in the face that you can get. Santorum is wrong.
So, DeLay shouldn't mind answering questions. But if he was doing something wrong that would need to come out.
Had Santorum kept his mouth shut, Congressman Delay wouldn't have to answer to anything. The RATS have been trying to get DeLay out for a long time. That's because he does what he's supposed to do.