[NRA2BFree]

Sorry, I disagree. Did you write this for WND or are you commenting on a WND article?

That's besides the point. This was NOT a MSM article. It was a VANITY and is his opinion. It does not have to post a source. This is what you said:

That "article" sounds more like a temper tantrum than "journalism".

That is incorrect. He is NOT claiming to be a journalist, and in no way is it a "temper tantrum."

He merely stated the truth about what Santorum is doing to Tom DeLay.

[texasflower]

Initially he had both WND and Newsmax listed on the body of the article. Is that no longer there? I know someone asked for the moderator to make some sort of changes.

That is why I asked. With WND posted as a link, but no article listed it appears to have been an article or op-ed written for WND.

Do you understand now?

Besides, saying Tom DeLay should answer questions doesn't mean Santorum is DOING anything to him.

Are you opposed to Republicans having to account for their actions?

I'm a staunch republican and a very strong Bush supporter, but I don't see a thing wrong with having politician's having to account for their actions.