We've been at "this point" for a decade or more. Secular humanism and "the love of money," nothing new under the sun.
I'd have to ponder how to handle Gaddy's offer. If I trusted the doctors, and if Mae had a fair prognosis, I think I'd turn Gaddy down. The fact that she doesn't like the public view means that the public view is effectively working against her interests.
I'm wondering if any attempt has been made to talk with Mae's caretaker; the woman who has been driving her to appointments, etc.
Maybe if Ken agreed that "HE" would stop personally talking to the media, etc. He could give the important info to say a "third party", i.e, the caretaker (as someone close to the family) and that person could see that vital information was released at the appropriate time. That way the family could see Mae,evaluate her care,present condition and maybe even get her input as to what she wants done. Just a thought.
Also concerned about the status of that Temporary Guardianship. I saw a second petition (4-1-05)in the WND copy that was recently posted. On the same day that the judge granted the initial temporary guardianship with ability to make medical decisions...it was suppose to be valid for 45 days, or until petition for regular/permanent guardianship is heard; whichever occurs first. He then grants PERMANENT Guardianship to GADDY!...the very same day.