The person also changed the wording on choice #2. Unless a person reading the form believed that people would rather be fed while they're dehydrated, rather than being hydrated while they're starved, I would expect such a person would perceive that "including" referred to services that should be provided, rather than services to be withheld.
I noticed that alteration too. Someone either intended to mislead the meaning or just wasn't paying attention while retyping it to suit their individual intentions. A little obvious they didn't proofread it!
Thanks to all who helped clarify this question for me.
I know one thing for sure. I won't use Mae's format when I draft mine WILL TO LIVE.