Replies

Here it is:

1.) If at any time I should:

( ) have a terminal condition.
(X) become in a coma with no reasonable expectation of regaining consciousness, or
(X)become in a persistent vegetative state with no reasonable expectation of regaining significant congnitive function as defined in... Code of Georgia.

Annoted, I direct the application of life-sustaining procedures to my body:

(X) including nourishment and hydration, or
( ) including hydration but not nourishment, or
( ) excluding nourishment and hydration, be withheld or withdrawn and that I be permitted to die;

2. In the absence of my ability to give directions regarding the use of such life sustaining procdures, it is my intention that this living will shall be honored by my family and physician(s) as the final expression of my legal right to refuse medical or surgical treatment and accept the consequences from such refusal;

[So, I was wrong when I worried that Mae could be denied nourishment and hydration if she slips into a coma. She has set up her living will to protect her from being starved and dehydrated if she is PVS or in a coma. Although, it is not clear to me if this means that she CAN be denied nourishment and hydration if she is declared terminally ill.]

clears up that thought...thank you. I'm thinking a 3rd grader could have drawn it up better. Wonder if Beth put it together. Between her handwriting and apparent lack of integrity that she has displayed, I'd worry if I had any children in her class.

A different thought: Do you feel that Beth intentionally meant to understate Mae's financial worth when she listed the assets on the court documents? She is short on the total by $100,000. I'm wondering why it wasn't corrected if reviewed by the judge....ummm.

[So, I was wrong when I worried that Mae could be denied nourishment and hydration if she slips into a coma. She has set up her living will to protect her from being starved and dehydrated if she is PVS or in a coma. Although, it is not clear to me if this means that she CAN be denied nourishment and hydration if she is declared terminally ill.]

That is a horrible document. If I recall, the one she signed is formatted as you've indicated, but imagine if there were a list-end tag in front of the words "be withheld". How is anyone supposed to know which checkbox means what?

Note that if it's taken as though there were a list-end before "be withheld", that would mean that the middle box would say that people wanted to receive food but didn't want to receive water. Bizarre.