Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Believer In Truth
Looks like you and I agree on Mae's intent and as you said, ORDERED it to be done if she is in EITHER state; coma or PVS.

Well, actually, and now that I read the entire form (the last phrase is the kicker), the checkbox that was marked results in the following statement:

I direct that the application of life-sustaining procedures to my body, including nourishment and hydration, be withheld or withdrawn and that I be permitted to die.

If a person wants to be fed and watered, the "excluding noirishment and hydration" box is to be checked, which results in the following, somewhat awkward statement:

I direct that the application of life-sustaining procedures to my body, excluding nourishment and hydration, be withheld or withdrawn and that I be permitted to die.

Mae is going to need to revoke this Living Will ASAP, unless she wants to be starved to death.

2,322 posted on 04/12/2005 6:37:11 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2317 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

The only place I see the phrase " that I be permitted to die" is in the section she didn't check. Too confusing to this lay mind. No wonder people should have a lawyer they "trust completely" help them with the directives.

I agree, a new document, properly prepared, would be best for Mae.


2,329 posted on 04/12/2005 6:46:49 PM PDT by Believer In Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson