I believe Mae's financial POA to Gaddy is at least temporarily not operative, and that Gaddy has both financial and medical powers (circumscribed by the court order to abide by the treatment regimen prescribed by the three doctor team) as granted by the court order of April 4.
The objection to Gaddy's guardianship was dismissed by the court (not noting whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice; I assume it was without). I don't believe another objection has been filed. I do think that the family is in disagreement as to who should be the "permanent" guardian. Gaddy's guardianship letter expires 45 days after April 1, or when a petition for regular guardianship is heard, whichever comes sooner.
I guess my question is, has Mae objected?
There have been alot of claims that Mae's lack of lucidy was only the result of the alleged hospice care. Too much morphine and not enough food and water. That has presumably been reversed at UAB and I anticipate a lucid Mae to emerge soon, if what those claimants say is true. The time of reckoning is near, one way or the other.
"Gaddy's guardianship letter expires 45 days after April 1, or when a petition for regular guardianship is heard, whichever comes sooner."
Mae granted her POA on 2/11/05. Is there a reason given for this or anyone know why?