The only party before the Court on that day was Gaddy. She appeared with her brother and their attorney. Gaddy advocates keeping Mae in hospice.
And on the same day a doctor examined Mae to and found her to be mentally incapacitated. I call that corroboration and your splitting hairs over the word dementia.
You can call it what you want. But if Mae is doped up on morphine, she is mentally incapacitated as a matter of law. The mental incapacity in that case clears up as the effects of the drugs wear off. Dementia, OTOH, does not cure itself. There is a significant difference, and your equating the two is intellectually dishonest.
Your claim was false in any event, Gaddy was not the only one asserting dementia.
You have not provided any evidence of others, besides Gaddy, finding dementia. The fact that a court says "Gaddy says Mae has dementia" is not the court's finding that Mae in fact has dementia.
The court did not say that and did find that Mae was suffering from dementia and the other problems. Gaddy provided enough documentation to satisfy the court. The subsequent findings by Dr. Jones corroborate the finding.
From page 7 of the 32 page court document
"...The Court finds that the Ward, Ora Mae Magouirk, is suffering from dementia, an aortic aneurism and a blood clot...."