Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Smartaleck
Both parties to the court pottition mention inability to make decisions.

Inability to make one's own decisions is a prerequisite to granting guardianship.

The only party that asserted dementia was, IIRC, Beth Gaddy. Also, IIRC, the first time the assertion was made was in her petition to the court for guardianship.

2,236 posted on 04/12/2005 6:49:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2234 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
The only party that asserted dementia was, IIRC, Beth Gaddy

Judge Boyd found Mae's dementia to be a fact of the case. It's in his April 1, 2005 ruling.

2,239 posted on 04/12/2005 7:05:23 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2236 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

"The only party that asserted dementia was, IIRC, Beth Gaddy."

The court appointed Dr. Jones to evaluate. He opined the proposed ward was incapcitated by reason of mental incapacity.

Ken and sister filed papers agreeing the ward was in need of a guardian.


2,414 posted on 04/13/2005 4:51:34 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson