Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nicmarlo

Posted by Fred Nerks to FR_addict
On News/Activism 04/08/2005 9:20:50 PM PDT · 367 of 369


Useless Eaters vs The Death Cult: # 189 (snip)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1372897/posts



Dr. Peter Bambakidis testimony that heart attack wasn’t cause for Terri’s collapse



BEFORE: THE HONORABLE GEORGE W. GREER

Circuit Court Judge

PLACE: PINELLAS COUNTY COURTHOUSE

315 Court Street

Clearwater, Florida

DATE: October 15th, 16th, 17th, 20th & 22nd, 2002

Page 222

1 MR. FELOS: Thank you, Your Honor.

2 THEREUPON,

3 PETER BAMBAKIDIS, M.D.

4 WAS ADDUCED AS THE WITNESS HEREIN AND AFTER

5 BEING DULY SWORN ON OATH WAS EXAMINED AND

6 TESTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

7 DIRECT EXAMINATION

Page 271

Q. Now, what did Mr. Schiavo tell you

6 about Terri's history?

7 A. Basically, I had approached this the

8 way I would approach examining any patient. In

9 other words, the history of the present illness,

10 what exactly happened back in 1990.

11 Q. So you got his description of the

12 underlying incident?

13 A. The events that occurred at that

14 particular point in time.

15 Q. Did he tell you that she had had a

16 heart attack?

17 A. No, I don't remember -- I do not recall

18 that.

19 Q. You concluded that she did have a heart

20 attack, though, correct?

21 A. No, I did not.

22 Q. It's not in your report?

23 A. No, I don't believe it is.

24 Q. What is your understanding of what

25 happened to her?

Page 272

1 A. Well, my understanding is that she did

2 have a cardiac arrest.

3 Q. Okay.

4 A. My understanding is further that there

5 seems -- it's still not definite exactly what the

6 cause of the cardiac arrest was.

7 Q. It was definitely not a heart attack

8 because her enzymes were not elevated, correct?

9 A. Well, I'm not going to answer that

10 directly. Suffice it to say that the diagnosis

11 of MI was not made or myocardial infarction was

12 not made.



DID YOU CATCH THIS ONE?


1,330 posted on 04/08/2005 11:16:43 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Proud to be an Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1326 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

Yes; I've read that before. But most people, especially, greer likes to ignore ALL testimony taken.


1,334 posted on 04/08/2005 11:24:25 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1330 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks

Still going for the Micheal choked her theory. Well, it doesn't fly and let me tell you why: Take a look at the mal-practice case Mr. Schiavo filed on behalf of Terri Schiavo. The doctors being sued had access to ALL of Mrs. Schiavo's records including the now infamos bone scanes. Do you not think they would have raised the wife beater defence at trial? It would have been the perfect argument.
BTW that is the same trial in that Mr. Schindler said Micheal Schiavo was the best husband and son-in-law he could have ever asked for.
And I love all the he got the money and wanted to kill her off theories. The man would have recieved a larger settlement had the DNR been in place during the trial not put on afterwards. And who in thier right mide waits almost six years after winning money in a court settlement to pull the plug? If Mr. Schiavo was in it for the money he did everything possible to ensure he wouldn't get much.


1,351 posted on 04/09/2005 12:06:53 AM PDT by judgemc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson