To: stands2reason
The WPPPPFFFT! manifesto stated plainly that the rest of FR wasn't worth participating in. If that isn't "splitting" off, I don't know what would be.
To: Kryptonite
The WPPPPFFFT! manifesto stated plainly that the rest of FR wasn't worth participating in. If that isn't "splitting" off, I don't know what would be.It isn't splitting off. Not sure how you reached that conclusion, unless you were part of that "group think" that preached "if you don't agree with us, STFU" or "Go back to DU you troll", merely because I was defending the rule of law and the Constitution.
447 posted on
04/04/2005 10:20:04 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
("Stupidity is also a gift of God, but one mustn't misuse it" - Pope John Paul II)
To: Kryptonite
The WPPPPFFFT! manifesto stated plainly that the rest of FR wasn't worth participating in. If that isn't "splitting" off, I don't know what would be.What you have said here is completely and totally false. But then, you already knew that.
465 posted on
04/04/2005 10:23:29 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(Sure you can trust the government... just ask an Indian...)
To: Kryptonite
The WPPPPFFFT! manifesto stated plainly that the rest of FR wasn't worth participating in. If that isn't "splitting" off, I don't know what would be. If, as you say, this is "stated plainly", then it should be a simple matter for you to c/p the evidence to support your claim. Please do so.
604 posted on
04/04/2005 10:55:58 PM PDT by
malakhi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson