To: warsaw44
I've seen rumors that casting is just about to start getting underway. Maybe this will be a big summer movie next year . . .
To: FoxInSocks
I just pray they don't mess this up. Pearl Harbor could have been an amazing movie and I understand the script was rewritten to include the love interest, the movie U-571 was so PC and foolish my pals and I just sat there with our jaws dropped, Enemy at the Gates could also have been great but still - the flippin' love interest ruined it.
I think these studio heads figure they must have a love interest in a war movie to increase the number of woman who will attend with a boy friend / husband. But Steven Spielberg's " Saving Private Ryan " had no love interest and was an enormous success.
Movies are the few times teenagers learn anything about history. I just hope a movie about Iwo Jima is not tuned into a sad tale of the oppressed Japanese longing for home, writing Haikus by candlelight in the tunnels and being slaughtered by the racist, imperialistic Americans.
I had always hoped Hollywood would recreate the Battle of Bunker Hill and the 44 uprising of Warsaw.
4 posted on
04/12/2005 2:53:55 PM PDT by
warsaw44
(" hey, hey, ho , ho - liberal chants that begin hey hey ho ho have to go ")
To: FoxInSocks
I've seen rumors that casting is just about to start getting underway. Casting began 11 April, per industry trade papers. Some details *here*.
5 posted on
04/14/2005 6:19:48 PM PDT by
archy
(The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson