Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul

No, they weren't. Taking the mere word of a man who "suddenly remembered" something she said 7 years after the fact is not "making more effort"--Heaven help those who make little off-hand remarks ("I'd rather die than wear a dress like that" or "I wouldn't want to live past 30, ewww, that's ancient" etc.), lest someone hold them to it with the same tenacity as Michael Schiavo did.


64 posted on 03/31/2005 8:25:46 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
Okay, so you don't like the way her wishes were determined by the Court - that's clear. My point is that any flaws in the way her wishes were determined by the Court do not necessarily mean the Court didn't get it right, i.e. maybe those were her wishes.

Some here dispute her right to have the tube removed even if she wanted it removed. Do you? Do you at least agree that removal of the tube was proper IF she wanted it? And that you don't know any more about what she wanted than I do?

67 posted on 03/31/2005 8:30:24 AM PST by lugsoul (Wild Turkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson