To: xsmommy
Yes, thank you very much.
201 posted on
03/31/2005 9:15:10 AM PST by
Argh
To: Argh; Congressman Billybob; xsmommy; hobbes1; Dan from Michigan
It was the utter refusal to do the "new review" that astounds me. And that decision, is squarely to blame on Clinton's anointed federal judge. (Whittenmore, I think.)
But at the Supreme Court level, why did they ignore the new law passed by Congress? Why was that law considered "unconstitutional"?
And, does anybody know the Supreme Court count? 5-4? Unanimous?
203 posted on
03/31/2005 9:29:11 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson