Your hypothetical has too many variables for me to even bother with.
The point being that the courts don't just jump in when ever they feel like it. They have to be asked to look into something before they will. They were asked to look into it by both sides in this case, so far as I know. The parents need to quit asking courts to look into it if they don't like the answers they are getting.
The point of myself and others on this thread has been that we can't bitch and moan about liberals not following court orders if we are going to do the same thing.
Do you get that?
The point of myself and others on this thread has been that we can't bitch and moan about liberals not following court orders if we are going to do the same thing. Do you get that?
Here is what you don't get. What gives a judge the power to order anything that is unconstitutional? I understand that you don't want to answer my question, but what would have happened if Abraham Lincoln kowtowed to Chief Justice Taney when he ordered that all black people were not equal to white people?
What if today the Supreme Court should review
Dred Scott vs. Sanford at the request of the KKK and Robert Byrd and rule in the same manor as Taney?
What would you have President Bush do?
What do you think Clinton would have done?