Replies

I said: Is it fair to say it isn't the feeding tube that you're against, it's lower mental "capacity"? ... You replied: No, absolutely not! I'm against bridging the separation of powers between the three branches. I'm against letting emotion override the law.

I'm sorry, not sure which question you're answering with "Absolutely not". You're absolutely not against feeding tubes? You're absolutely not against starving persons of lower mental capacity?

On separation of powers, I agree but it appears that it's the judicial branch that has overridden it's powers and is not being checked by the others (besides blustering). As to emotion over the law, is there ever a time to "go against the law"? If so, when and why?

You don't comprehend too well, do you? The question which I answered was quoted above my answer.

the determination of judicial abuse ain't yours to make.

When is it right to be a vigilante? The more laws that there are, the less law that there is! Already you have people picking a choosing which laws they'll follow. With more laws will come less law, and soon the law will be worthless and our country's greatness over. Then is the time for the vigilante.