To: dufekin
I hate to break this to you, but presidential pardons are limited to federal criminals,
Isn't there some merit, albeit weird, to the notion that Judge Greer has declared Terri a criminal by his order to have her executed?
8 posted on
03/26/2005 1:08:22 PM PST by
farmer18th
("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
To: farmer18th
Greer didn't declare Terri a criminal; only a jury could do that (unless she, or her lawyers on her behalf, waived the right ot a jury trial). So Greer took a more insidious track, following precedent set by the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) and Roe et al. v. Wade (1973), and declared that Terri, although genetically human, is not a person, and as such, not endowed by our Creator with the certain inalienable right to life. Rather, Judge Greer ruled, Terri Schiavo is a member of a certain non-endangered species of xerophytic cacti, and as such, will not suffer if denied food and water for the next several months; eventually, the cactus might shrivel and die.
14 posted on
03/26/2005 1:24:17 PM PST by
dufekin
(United States of America: a judicial tyranny, not a federal republic)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson