Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueriver

People here keep using this specious term "threw out evidence" - the court DID NOT "throw out" that evidence - it received it, considered it, and found it to be less credible than the countervailing evidence. Since you didn't hear the testimony in court, you have no way of determining the soundness of that decision, or lack thereof.


41 posted on 03/25/2005 8:31:01 AM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
You need to read up on this case - Judge Greer admitted he made a mistake in "throwing" out that testimony. He was in error. Then he said it didn't matter that he made a mistake because it would not have changed his mind about his desire to have this woman killed. He selected which evidence to keep and which to through out. Basically if it came out of the mouth of her "husband" is was legit, if it came out of the mouth of anyone else it wasn't.
89 posted on 03/25/2005 10:06:55 AM PST by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson