Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
The disappointment / anger with the courts on this matter is rooted in the fact that the courts refused to make rulings based upon supposition, innuendo, and unfounded allegations.

My beef with the courts is that I believe it failed to find Terri's wishes. I will concede, of course, all of the procedural steps you noted were in fact carried out. Interested people will look at the evidence before the court, and draw their own conclusion.

... the decision was supported by competent evidence. The countervailing evidence was admitted, and it was addressed.

Yes it was. And the outcome was the wrong one, in my opinion. At that is my beef. It has nothing to do with supposition, innuendo, and unfounded allegations, as you assert.

31 posted on 03/25/2005 8:10:26 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
In almost every case that gets to trial, you have people on one side telling one story and people on the other telling another story. It is not necessarily that some are lying, though they sometimes are, but rather that both sides actually believe the version of events they are telling - and it is the job of the court, whether the jury or the judge, to assess the credibility of the testimony. So, for example, when a doctor who gives testimony is exposed as touting bogus credentials (like a "Nobel Prize nomination"), it gives the court a basis for questioning the credibility of the witness. Also, anyone whose ever heard testimony knows that you just can't know if a witness is credible until you hear them on cross. No one on this thread has heard the nurses on cross. No one here has heard the Schindler's so-called experts on cross. No one here is in a position to credibly substitute their judgment on who is telling the truth for the judgment of the court.

I do know that Terri's own lawyers, one of whom was appointed by Jeb, found no basis for the abuse allegations. Terri's own lawyers practically begged the Schindlers to present medical testimony more credible than what they relied upon (one even wondered why the most qualified doc they hired [Webber, I think?], whose affidavit was used to actually get a new hearing, did not provide testimony at the hearing).

We also know that the Schindlers conceded FOR YEARS in the court process that Terri was PVS. That didn't change until some of the more questionable characters in these events got involved.

38 posted on 03/25/2005 8:29:05 AM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson