Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt; Borges
If the patient's wishes aren't known, a court finds the patient's wishes and charges the guardian with the duty.

If a patients wishes are not known, it is the family, not the courts, who decides what they think the person might have wanted. The only reason the courts are involved in this case at all is because Terri's legal guardian (like it or not), made a decision that other family members did not agree with. The courts in this case are being used to settle a family dispute.
136 posted on 03/25/2005 12:14:46 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green is made of liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: teenyelliott
The only reason the courts are involved in this case at all is because Terri's legal guardian (like it or not), made a decision that other family members did not agree with. The courts in this case are being used to settle a family dispute.

Obviously you are correct on the last point. But the guardian does not have the automatic right, under Florida law, to deny life-sustaining basic care for a patient. Oh heck. I'm not gonna discuss with you. Don't take it personal. I'm just tired. I know I'm right, and I'm satisfied with my own research.

139 posted on 03/25/2005 12:20:16 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson