Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hobbes1
The way I read the Congressional bill, it intended for a brand new trial in Federal court. The Schindler's attorneys are STILL raising constitutional issues that are pathetically weak instead of trying to have a new trial on the facts.

The problem isn't with the Constitution or a violation of the Americans with Disabilites Act. It's with the facts. If there is any wrath to be directed to anyone, start with David Gibbs.

124 posted on 03/25/2005 11:13:45 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

No. How about "Judge" Greer.


Thats where this starts. Gibbs is probably next.


126 posted on 03/25/2005 11:15:08 AM PST by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "For your AMUSEMENT..." ; ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson