To: bikepacker67
It does not matter what Terri wanted! She did not commit anything in writing and her guardian has made the decision. Do you understand that?
77 posted on
03/24/2005 12:10:23 PM PST by
Trust but Verify
(Pull up a chair and watch history being made.)
To: Trust but Verify
So, if I'm the guardian of a foster child, I can decide that I want to murder them?
92 posted on
03/24/2005 12:13:33 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Trust but Verify
Why is a husband who has clearly taken another wife still allowed to be guardian of the first wife? It should not be his decision to make. And no one should be allowed to decide to starve another person to death. If she were on life support that would be different, but she isn't. She is being denied BASIC care -- food and water.
101 posted on
03/24/2005 12:15:45 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Trust but Verify
It does not matter what Terri wanted! She did not commit anything in writing and her guardian has made the decision. Do you understand that? Using that convoluted logic, every severely mentally handicapped person can be systematically put to death.
Eugenics anyone??
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson