Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: G.Mason
I think that's the crux of the issue...

The court seems to be BLINDLY following the law which says "the husband is the guardian" even though there seem to be some pretty compelling facts that SHOULD extinguish his guardianship. I'll admit, I haven't read the Florida statute, but I would be greatly supposed if there aren't provisions for replacing schiavo as the guardian ad litum. Every other legal relationship can be severed if there is a clear conflict of interest, as guardianship over ones spouse should be no different.
335 posted on 03/24/2005 1:41:01 PM PST by The Hollywood Conservative (I can't even make a tagline because I'm a GIANT IDIOT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: The Hollywood Conservative
" ... there seem to be some pretty compelling facts ... "

"Seem to be". Key words, those.

Obviously the government, the courts, the lawyers and everyone and their brother are in a quandry over this.

Of course this is only the third or fourth time they have "pulled the pug" on Theresa.

Hell, let's just keep doing this until we all die of old age.

We can all meet here in two years, when they do it again, and hurl oaths at each other for a couple months. ;)

(I realize this is no laughing matter. I'm just smiling a little.)

356 posted on 03/24/2005 1:51:59 PM PST by G.Mason (The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson