[writer33]

If not the guardian, who?

I'd agree if there was definitive proof of that. However, this is all hear say evidence and technically inadmissible in a court of law. But in today's courts, it apparently doesn't matter.

[Trust but Verify]

Michael Schaivo is the guardian, period. He gets to decide. That's the law. Do we want to take the decision away from the guardian? I don't want a court making my end of life decisions for me.