Science is fun.
To: 3rdcanyon; 75thOVI; albee; Amityschild; andie74; annyokie; Augustus McCrae; Bassfire; ...
To: martin_fierro
Yuck. The only thing marginally worse than peeps are those nasty marshmallow peanuts.
4 posted on
03/22/2005 6:50:18 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: martin_fierro
6 posted on
03/22/2005 6:52:24 PM PST by
Cagey
(As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!!")
To: martin_fierro
7 posted on
03/22/2005 6:53:14 PM PST by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: martin_fierro
8 posted on
03/22/2005 6:56:32 PM PST by
katnip
(I'll hear the appeal at 3pm, but in the meantime, go ahead with the execution - judge whittemore)
To: martin_fierro
peeps ballistics....
12 posted on
03/22/2005 7:11:29 PM PST by
hookman
To: martin_fierro
Cool!!!! If you take two marshmallow peeps, put toothpicks in their front and have them face each other in the microwave, you can make them "joust." The loser is the peep that gets popped on the other's toothpick. Also take the marshmallow bunnies and put toothpicks in their "hands" and have them "duel" in the microwave.
17 posted on
03/22/2005 8:21:04 PM PST by
Nowhere Man
(I hope you enjoyed your dinner, Terri Schiavo can't. B-()
To: martin_fierro
Mmmm, I LOVE Peeps (and marshmallow peanuts and anything else marshmallow).
I've seen every one of these experiments years ago. Isn't there any novel, groundbreaking Peeps research? (Putting my mind to the task.)
23 posted on
03/23/2005 4:56:47 AM PST by
exDemMom
(Euthanasia, NO WAY. Youth in Asia, OF COURSE.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
