The questions I raised in my post # 45 still stand unanswered. Those things seem strange, unnerving.
HOWEVER, because of everyone's help here (THANK YOU LOADS!)I can make the following statements:
1) The state and county is listed on the top of the first page - this seems to be standard practice in FL. http://www.zimp.org/stuff/ . Also, see the Stephen Wise affidavit at http://terrisfight.org/ .
2) Patricia Anderson was the attorney for the Schindler's, as referenced in this article (among others) http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34175
PATRICIA FIELDS ANDERSON, ESQ.
Fla. Bar No. 352871
447 THIRD AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 405
ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33701
Phone: (727) 895-6505; Fax: (727) 898-4903
http://www.miami.edu/ethics/schiavo/1-05-04%20Schindlers%20petition%20to%20reappoint%20GAL.htm
3) There IS a Patricia Anderson listed as a notary public in FL, with a different commission #. Suspicious? NO. Here you can look her up: http://notaries.dos.state.fl.us/ If you go directly to this page, http://notaries.dos.state.fl.us/notidsearch.asp?id=12714 you will note that the name matches the above, and that the issue date is the day after the expiration date of the seal on the document which started this all. You may have noted that the middle initial is different than what is on the document. This can be easily explained by the fact that some (liberated?) women use their maiden name as their middle initial.
4) For whatever reason, a different commission number is used on the latest Patricia Anderson commission. The best I can tell, the "CC" series denotes a set of issue or expiration years. The DD series are the most recent commissions issued.
For whatever reason, the attorney's printed, stamped or typed name below her signature is not present, except as contained in the notary seal. This is sloppy work for an attorney, **at least in my state** - but in FL, things may be different: http://www.zimp.org/stuff/ (look at the Heidi Law #23 affidavit for similarity purposes). You can also examine the court documents at http://terrisfight.org/ for examples of diversity in affidavits.
The document is legal as best I can tell, but it is definitively NOT a hoax for the reasons my sister proffered.
NOW - how about the remaining inconsistencies?
BB62
Respecfully submitted,
TGH JKS
nice job
Tom broderson is Anderson's husband.
I have no doubt these are her words. I have questioned whether they were said under oath, and the lack of a circle on the "took an oath" part looked odd. Whatever, I have zero doubt they are lies.
See if you can get the transcript of greta's show last night. Carla was on with Richard Pearse - a video would be even better to show his facial reactions to her utterly unreal claims. the heidi law one was priceless too.
read my post 385 last night - can't sit up n post hardly at all today:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1369260/posts?page=385#385
also, google hammesfahr and nobel prize. I see others are already on that case all over the web. A few of us have been trying to expose these people as the frauds they are for 2 months - no one listened, lol.
I'll just do a < pre> tag and paste all my notes on my page as soon as i clean them up a bit.
good luck.
good people can have legitimate problems with what is being done. but connecting ourselves to these liars is already *killing* conservatives credibility.
at least glenn beck is distancing himself. now hannity, rush, and and the others have really got to or they'll be laughing stocks.
last week, Michael's brother was on a radio interview with terri's brother , who was repeating these rumors and concerns over abuse and michaels brother told him when this was over he had better have a good lawyer.
off to zzz again...