To: Old_Mil
I'm going for the Dyna Low-Rider, if I get one at all. I'm still not convinced it's a good move.
Right now I have a 2001 Sportster. I'm leery of the added weight, even though the Dyna sits lower and is more stable (I'm told.) The Sporty is topheavy.
I may just go with a new Sporty, now that they've moved and rounded out that blankety-blank battery case.
8 posted on
03/15/2005 1:26:48 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: SandyInSeattle
Right now I have a 2001 Sportster. I'm leery of the added weight, even though the Dyna sits lower and is more stable (I'm told.) The Sporty is topheavy.
Tough call. You're right in saying that you do get a lower CG with the Dyna - but at the expense of extra weight. Perhaps renting one from your local HD dealer for a weekend is the answer...
I came to HD after riding 700+ pound BMW touring bikes so both the Dyna and Sportster feel a bit like mopeds to me.
I may just go with a new Sporty, now that they've moved and rounded out that blankety-blank battery case.
The other advantage you'll get with 2004 and newer Sportsters is a rubber mounted engine, making for a much smoother motorcycle than the 2003 and older models.
Good luck whatever you decide...
11 posted on
03/15/2005 1:31:30 PM PST by
Old_Mil
To: SandyInSeattle
(Jus kiddin' about the beating up part - She's a sweetie.)
19 posted on
03/15/2005 1:37:41 PM PST by
NonLinear
("If not instantaneous, then extraordinarily fast" - Galileo re. speed of light. circa 1600)
To: SandyInSeattle
Ah, the Dyna's are a piece of cake compared to the Sporties. I'm a Sportster fan myself, I won't ride anything else anymore. However, I've ridden plenty of big twins, and they're much more forgiving than the more nimble Sportster with their greater HP to weight ratios.
64 posted on
03/15/2005 5:27:04 PM PST by
Melas
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson