Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should pornography be illegal?
Feb 28th 2005 | Me

Posted on 02/28/2005 5:53:06 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell

Prostitution: one adult pays another adult for sex- is illegal

Pornography: Where one adult pays two adults to have sex and brings a camera, This is legal.

Pornography has been around for over one hundred years, since the time of the camera,

but it has only been the last few decades where it became the money making industry that it is today. And today's pornography is much much worse.

This question came to me after reading this article

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353029/posts

an excerpt "The Justice Department is appealing the dismissal of an obscenity case in Pittsburgh in which a federal judge said prosecutors went too far in trying to block the sale of pornographic movies over the Internet and through the mail. The case initially was prosecuted under Ashcroft""

Should pornography be illegal?

It's an opinion question, you answer, give your reasons. Is it free speech or not? Why. And where is the line drawn? Has pornography promoted homosexuality and unsafe sex? Or is it a privacy issue?

Should there be standards on pornography?

Concerned Women for America say No- what do you think?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: 18yroldauthority; opinion; pornography; sheknowsherporn; voiceofachild
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-312 next last
To: nopardons

Books - Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Thomas sowell for example. Heck, even Dubya got a book.

Films - I'll admit we are sorely lacking but we've got a good thing going with the conservative film festival and all the pro-war and pro-bush film. And there was the passion and DC 9/11.

T.V. - Fox News, characters like Denny Crane. Granted, we are even worse of here than with movies.

Music - Kid Rock. Country Music. NOt impressive but better than nothing.

Theatre - got me there. One fortunate thing is ppl would rather utilize modern entertainment than traditional theater.

Radio - This is the one area we have major success, thx to El Rushbo. The libs response, Err America, is faltering badly. We've won the radio wars.

Magazines - Soldier of Fortune, Limbaugh Letter. There are probably more but I can't recall of the top of my head. Bcoz mags don't have an overwhelming influence on culture and there are conservative mags lying around, I'd say we are ok on this front.

Papers - Washington times, NY Post, Boston Herald, Wall Street Journal. Not as much as the lib papers, but should be enough that the ppl will know the truth.

Internet - Another major victory for conservatism. 10 leftist websites don't have the power of one conservative blog. FR and blogs like Powerline and LGF are striking it out as alternative sources of info and have far more power than a lefty loon grinding away a Bush-bashing editorial.

Politicians - Reagan, Dubya, Our Founding Fathers, Eisenhower, Coolidge, honorable men like Zell Miller, Tom Tancredo, Ron Paul etc. Whatever the history books say, thes men will always inspire patriotism, respect, and reverence. Xlintoon, Queery, Cartar will belleft behind on the ash heap of history.

Legal System - We've got our own sharks now. ACLJ, FIRE, Thomas More Center etc. Also we've still got conservative and common sense judges like Roy Moore kicking around. We are far from defeated in the court rooms.

Advertising - When the consumers speak, ppl listen. That's why Slim Fast dropped Whoopi cushion and many theaters avoided Fart and Hype 7/11 like the plague. We still have the power of the wallet. And the wallet is speaking louder and loudeer to the corporations.

At first the libs are just as powerless as us, but gradually and bit by bit, they persevered and succeeded in despoiling America. Now they made the same mistake we did in the 60s, they underestimated us, they figure that we could never succeed at overthrowing the status quo. They have become fat and complacent in their socialist successes. They are ripe for the taking.

Back in the 50s, some socialist is probably carping that they will never overthrow America, patriotic and moral Americans have control of everything and the American public will never accept the subversion of the constitution and their perverted agenda.

I can't guarantee final or instantaneous success. But have faith, we can and will turn the tide and restore our nation.

"Matthew 8:26 - And when he was entered into a ship, his disciples followed him. And, behold, there arose a great tempest in the sea, insomuch that the ship was covered with the waves: but he was asleep. And his disciples came to him, and awoke him, saying, Lord, save us: we perish. And he saith unto them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith? Then he arose, and rebuked the winds and the sea; and there was a great calm."


201 posted on 02/28/2005 11:32:40 PM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

"but you don't seriously believe the government should of outlaw every vice?"

Only in heaven does such a government exist for now. (One day that which is evil will be banished here too.)

But in the meantime, I surely don't think that government should APPROVE every vice either.


202 posted on 02/28/2005 11:41:41 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball; LauraleeBraswell
I highly doubt that Lauralee is 18,a female,or as stupid as she sometimes tries to be. A lot of her posts are badly done,she knows about things that she should,and pretends to not know about some things that no 18 year old from Long Island wouldn't know.It's an act and not a good one.

The reason some of her threads get lots of posts,is that some of us are on to her.

And this topic is the much beaten dust of a many times over dead horse.

Have you noticed that once this thread actually did get going,in a scholarly way,she abandoned it?

Pyramid? In China? Aren't you thinking of Indian temple art and perhaps Angkor What?

The ancient Egyptians DID have pornographic papyri rolls.The Japanese made pornographic Netsky (sp?),there are ancient porn books,which are NOT just your run of the mill "how to books",from many different countries/civilizations, which had nothing at all to do with religious totems/rites. And there is a vast difference between nude people in paintings and actual porn.

Actresses have always had bad reputations,because they were always very loose women/whores.There have been live sex shows,for titilation. My information is not in the least "disjointed" (look up the meaning of that word!) and my remark about ancient Egyptian porn was reiterated and substantiated by another poster.

Frankly,it's not my problem that neither you nor Lauralee knows anything much about this topic,but you feel it incumbent upon yourselves to cavil about me ,who does know about it, and the factual posts I've made about the topic.

203 posted on 03/01/2005 12:19:24 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Killborn
It pains me,but you're so wrong and can't see it at all.

A few Conservative nonfiction books don't cut it and neither does talk radio,FNC,magazines (SOLDIER OF FORTUNE? You really need to rethink that one...Ward Churchill used to write for that.),etc.! Mass media drowns all of that out and then some.

And nobody recognizes the "Conservative film festival" as even a big toe under the tent.

It's going to take many more years for that pendulum to swing back...we're a far way off,still in the wilderness;sadly.

204 posted on 03/01/2005 12:25:35 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
How about if we stop having anything to do with porn because we trust the LORD and understand that he has all knowledge and says that if anyone looks at another to lust in their hearts that they have committed adultery. Thou shalt not commit adultery. Playboy is definitely intended to cause the person who looks at the naked, compromised picture to lust so yes, Playboy is definitely pornography. That is the purpose of all porn, to make money by causing the unwise person to lust and compromise themselves before God and their own selves, not to mention their husbands or wives who they are to be faithful to and have a sacred holy relationship with. Let's stop living lives of rebellion like dim witted, naughty little children. In our culture we pay lots of attention to trying to be clean on the outside and put up with abject filth on the inside which is eternal. If we could see ourselves as God does (which is reality) and realize how absolutely filthy we are when we sin we would abhor ourselves and repent with tears and fasting. Sin is insanity. It is against God and totally destructive to ourselves, our dignity, our love ones and our eternal souls. It also hardens one so one experiences less and less real pleasure in the things of life. That is why the wicked are always going after the next forbidden sin. They are able to experience less and less pleasure in the things that done right and before God were meant to bring pleasure and satisfaction. To anyone who wants to be clean and understand and experience true satisfaction and love turn to Christ while there is still time. Learn what life was meant to be and this includes our sexual lives. Be smart and escape from being thrown into hell when it is over on this earth. Hell is the only place a fetid, filthy sinner apart from the forgiveness and cleansing that can only come from Christ belongs. It funny how we don't keep spoiled, nasty things around us but we can't understand why the LORD doesn't keep us around and disposes of us when we are stubbornly filthy, spoiled and nasty way beyond our comprehension. To those of you on the wrong side of this issue be smart and get clean and be fit for a decent life and an eternity in heaven.
205 posted on 03/01/2005 12:26:44 AM PST by Bellflower (A new day is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Well, as long as we keep trying.


206 posted on 03/01/2005 12:27:04 AM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

..it couldn't hurt.


207 posted on 03/01/2005 12:27:32 AM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

We have to...but as I've said,it's going to take a while.


208 posted on 03/01/2005 12:28:03 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Yep. Where there is a will...

Good night. Nice arguing with you. ;P See you later in the battlefields of the culture wars. X)

(I can barely keep my eyes open)


209 posted on 03/01/2005 12:31:52 AM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Killborn
I've been fighting this war for decades and shan't stop.

We all do what little we can.:-)

We weren't arguing,just discussing...which was nice.

Pleasant dreams.

210 posted on 03/01/2005 12:44:44 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Urban legend
211 posted on 03/01/2005 1:10:37 AM PST by Redcloak (More cleverly arranged 1's and 0's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Once they start getting money from something, they start promoting it.

The gov't gets tons of money from alcohol taxes, but I don't see it promoting alcohol use.

212 posted on 03/01/2005 1:39:46 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
You're just a killjoy, you know that?

But seriously, thanks for straightening things up.

213 posted on 03/01/2005 1:42:27 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Sorry, I meant to write "art depicting the beauty of the nude human form"

What about "art depicting the beauty of two people being physically intimate?"

214 posted on 03/01/2005 1:43:52 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
What about "art depicting the beauty of two people being physically intimate?"

I dunno... Some of those sites are about as artistic as a bullfighter on black velvet. (And some of the women are almost as attractive as the bull!)


215 posted on 03/01/2005 1:52:30 AM PST by Redcloak (More cleverly arranged 1's and 0's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

What about the art of depicting a man shooting his load on a woman's face? At what point does beauty overwhelm offensiveness? Never, I say. It's either offensive or it's not, regardless of any beauty or artistry. The subject is what it is, and that's how we should regulate it. The skill of the artist is for the viewer to decide, not for the gov't to measure.


216 posted on 03/01/2005 2:07:22 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
Concerned Women for America say No-

Depends on what they're concerned about ...

217 posted on 03/01/2005 2:41:01 AM PST by dread78645 (Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
It's a sad day when that "which is legal" is the wrong instead of the right. Talk about an upside down world......

"What is ominous is the ease with which some people go from saying that they don't like something to saying that the government should forbid it. When you go down that road, don't expect freedom to survive very long."

-- Thomas Sowell

218 posted on 03/01/2005 2:54:47 AM PST by dread78645 (Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
In our present world, laws sometime are necessary to establish what is right and to keep an orderly society.

Wow. Thanks Dad!
Can I play ball until the street lights come on? Huh?

219 posted on 03/01/2005 3:05:37 AM PST by dread78645 (Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

What's with you rushing to this "chick's" defense all the time...it's kinda creepy!


220 posted on 03/01/2005 3:39:28 AM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson