Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kellynla

Yes, the lament about ratings being down because there were no "blockbuster" ($100m+) nominees is laughable.

"The Passion" was THE blockbuster and the judges ignored it, so "The Passion"'s audience ignored the Oscars and awaits its re-release.

Seems fair and balanced to me.


10 posted on 02/28/2005 3:26:25 PM PST by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WestTexasWend
"The Passion" was THE blockbuster and the judges ignored it, so "The Passion"'s audience ignored the Oscars and awaits its re-release.

That about sums it up.

I would have watched for only reason, that reason was dismissed by the Academy. I have no other reason to watch these people.

I note they fail to mention why the Oscars were so low in 2003. I seem to recall the celebrities were at the height of their obnoxious best bashing Bush and the war and the country turned on them.

21 posted on 02/28/2005 3:33:14 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson