To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 240 names. See list's description at my homepage. FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
12 posted on
02/26/2005 3:49:19 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: All
A few words to the creationists:
You can't meaningfully participate in the science threads unless you can show that you've bought a ticket. The ticket is some basic understanding of what's going on here; and the price you have to pay for it is the effort needed to bring yourself up to speed. No ticket, no credibility.
The Theory of Evolution. (Excellent introductory encyclopedia article.)
The scientific method. You must know what science is (hint: it's not a cult).
What's a Scientific Theory? Encyclopedia article. Yes, evolution is a theory. That's a good thing.
Evolution as Fact and Theory by Stephen Jay Gould. Very useful article.
The List-O-Links. Direct link to the right part of my homepage.
13 posted on
02/26/2005 3:51:14 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: furball4paws; longshadow
It's interesting -- to me anyway -- to compare the evolution of the ping list logo. Post #12 has the ping I made in this thread almost exactly one year ago, which is reproduced here:
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 240 names. See list's description at my homepage. FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
We then had somewhat over 240 names, which I thought was a lot. The latest (erroneously posted) version of the logo is at post #41, but reproduced here:
We now have over 350 names, so we've gained 110 in a year. Verily, evolution is on its last legs.
55 posted on
02/25/2006 6:15:37 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
Unfortunately, the new species had the root of a cabbage and the leaf of a radish, and therefore had no commercial value. Why is this such a big deal? It isn't 'macro'evolution. The new plant is still part of the salad "kind".
81 posted on
02/26/2006 7:11:29 AM PST by
Quark2005
(Confidence follows from consilience.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson