Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DGray
Elimination of the dogs deprived the Inuit of access to the wild game diet to which their biological systems had become accustomed over many thousands of years.

Notice that the man said the dogs could smell caribou miles away ~ people dan't. The dogs could also bring down the caribou and small game to be "shared" (dogs being social they share, particularly with the alpha in the group, in this case the Inuit man driving the team).

When you're system is all geared up to eat your requisit diet of 40% protein per day, 57% fat, and 3% stomach contents (if you're lucky), adopting the agricultural substitute of 90% starch and 10% sugar just doesn't cut it. You'll burn out in no time, and that's called diabetes!

8 posted on 02/24/2005 5:24:20 PM PST by muawiyah ( (do I really have to put the /sarcasm tag on things like this?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Gotcha. Given this and the other consequences described in the article, I would be very surprised if human deaths didn't directly result from this action.


10 posted on 02/24/2005 5:27:50 PM PST by DGray (http://nicanfhilidh.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson