But can a ban on matches be enforced?
Under a plan now awaiting final approval, all passengers would be required to surrender their lighters and matches before entering security screening. That means no lighters or matches in carry-on bags, or even in checked luggage. Retail shops along concourses inside secure areas would be banned from selling them, and airport employees couldn't carry them either.
Smokers flying Tuesday wondered how it would work.
"If you smoke you have to carry matches and lighters with you to smoke," said one traveler at Los Angeles International Airport. "What do you do, do you purchase a lighter every time you fly in and out of an airport? If you want to smoke, I think it's carrying it just a little bit too far."
"I just think it's getting ridiculous," echoed another traveler at Seattle-Tacoma International. "Matches? Come on, I think it's stupid."
The proposed ban is partly based on the fears of another Richard Reid, who tried to light explosives in his shoes aboard a flight to the United States three years ago.
The intelligence reform bill President Bush signed late last year requires a ban on lighters. But the Department of Homeland Security decided to go further, calling for a ban on matches, too. Still, the agency acknowledged that it will be almost impossible to enforce the ban, since matches cannot be picked up by metal detectors or X-ray machines.
Even so, says an internal government memo, "total detectability is not a prerequisite for prohibiting a potential threat to airline security."
A senator who pushed for the ban says it's still a good idea to try.
"You can't smoke on an airplane so you aren't going to get on an airplane and light up," said Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D. "So what's the purpose of having a butane lighter or books of matches, especially when the FBI has said had Richard Reid had the butane lighter he would have blown up the airplane with a shoe bomb?"
Security officials hope the ban will at least reduce the number of matches that get onto airplanes and encourage passengers to call out if they see anybody aboard trying to light them.
© 2005 MSNBC Interactive
ARRRGGHHHH!!!!
My question is: What's the purpose of having a Byron Dorgan. NO ONE needs one of those!
Gads. Pretty soon they'll make everyone show up naked.
The TSA plans to impose a ban that they can't enforce. This isn't the intelligence reform bill Congress voted on and President Bush signed late last year. Homeland security decided to embellish upon the original.
"Security officials hope the ban will at least reduce the number of matches that get onto airplanes and encourage passengers to call out if they see anybody aboard trying to light them."
Ummm...so you can have a cigarette outside the terminal before you enter (so you won't have a nic fit and strangle the flight attendents) and then be able to smoke when you reach your destination? Who elected this box of rocks?
Now I know how I'll finally make my first million--I'll be a light-up valet at the cabstands and limo waiting areas outside the "Arrivals" doorways at O'Hare offering a flick of my Bic at a buck a pop--And the best part of it is.......I CAN SMOKE ON THE JOB!--
Cool!!--C