"The great majority of FReepers just want Sean to be better prepared and do his homework, and use his media opportunities to do a stronger job for the conservatives. If that constitutes an "attack", I do not think so."
You overlook the fact that many times Hannity is *personally insulted* - that IS an "attack". You yourself say he's stupid down below, and calling some1 self-righteous isn't exactly constructive, either. Don't hand me that Hannity is only constructively criticized as in "please do more homework Sean!" That's nonsense. I haven't been around that long and I've seen plenty.
Have you ever listened to Mark Levin on his radio show?
Sorry, I disagree, I believe it can be very constructive.... if the person can assimilate the suggestion.
Pointing out that someone may come off as self-righteous may be hard to take, but nevertheless it can be true. Let me honestly ask you, have you ever found it harder to listen to a person's argument or point of view when they came off as self-righteous and all-knowing? Yes? There is a natural tendency to pull away from a seemingly arrogant person.
Sean is in the business to influence people over to our side. It is important that he do it well. Being seen as sanctimonious does not help to influence people. In fact it works in the directly opposite way. Imo, we can not afford our "spokesmen" to come off that way........ especially with Hillary hanging around the corner.