Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan19
Against it. I don't care what gays do in their home, but I don't want my tax money paying for it with benefits.
17 posted on 02/16/2005 9:33:36 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("PLAYOFFS? Don't talk about playoffs. You kidding me. Playoffs?" - Jim Mora Sr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dan from Michigan
but I don't want my tax money paying for it with benefits.

Jenny Guv (MI) got smacked on this issue here.  Something tells me her re-election campaign is going to be selfish fun.

No hope for a senate seat in the near future but these endless "fees" or tax increases just may PO the blue collar tier who takes the brunt of these layered tax hikes, and will hopefully backfire. 

With a strong governor, MI would be a red state.  Again.

48 posted on 02/16/2005 9:50:55 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

[i]I don't care what gays do in their home, but I don't want my tax money paying for it with benefits.[/i]

Kind of agree... as a straight single person, I think it's unfair that any relationship of any kind gets a governmental blessing in the form of a tax advantage.

The gov't should define all as civil unions... churches should be allowed to decide if they want to perform marriage ceremonies. The gov't shouldn't butt into the picture (no pun intended LOL!).


59 posted on 02/16/2005 10:26:07 PM PST by helen back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson