Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM looks to spread Linux with 'Chiphopper' (Possible prep for the Cell???)
Marketwatch -CNET ^ | February 14, 2005, 11:37 AM PST | By Martin LaMonica Staff Writer, CNET News.com

Posted on 02/14/2005 4:53:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

IBM plans to launch on Tuesday a program to make Linux applications available across its entire hardware line.

Called the IBM eServer Application Server Advantage for Linux and code-named Chiphopper, the package includes tools aimed at programmers as well as support and marketing resources from IBM. Linux distributors and IBM partners Red Hat and Novell were involved in the development of the tools and endorsed the project.

By participating in the program, independent software vendors will have an easier time moving, or "porting," applications from x86 processor-based servers to servers that run on IBM's Power chips and to IBM mainframes.

To complement the technical offerings, Big Blue is extending its partner program to independent software vendors, or ISVs, that sell Linux applications.

IBM will give application providers access to its testing centers and has created a structure so that ISVs can collaborate on specific customer segments, including those considering a move from Windows NT to Linux or from Solaris to Linux. IBM will also support applications that have been ported from the x86 chip to IBM's chips and provide a program certification logo.

Much of the initial interest in Linux as a server operating system was fueled by the availability of relatively cheap hardware based on x86 processors from Intel or Advanced Micro Devices.

IBM, however, has invested in making Linux run on all the hardware systems it sells, including those based on Intel chips, Unix servers, mainframes and its iSeries hardware. Better tools for creating Linux applications on multiple processors will help spur sales of IBM hardware, 40 percent of which is non-Intel servers, according to IBM.

"It's generally part of an effort to fight the perception, held in many quarters, that Linux is nothing more than an x86 phenomenon," said Stephen O'Grady, an analyst at RedMonk. "IBM wants to expand (application) vendors' horizons to non-x86 platforms."

Chiphopper includes porting and testing software that helps programmers identify potential incompatibilities. IBM said it is using Linux Standard Base as the standardized version of the Linux operating system.

Red Hat and Novell backed the program because it could grow the number of applications that run on Linux, an important factor for many corporate and consumer customers.

"Making sure that key enterprise applications work seamlessly on leading hardware platforms is a critical component" to adoption of Linux, said Hal Bennett, vice president of Novell Business Development.

IBM signed on 11 ISVs that intend to use the Chiphopper software and program.

The program is one of many efforts IBM has to encourage software providers to build applications that are optimized to run on its Linux servers or its middleware infrastructure software.

Sun Microsystems has created an open-source version of its Solaris operating system in large part to entice programmers to get a better look at its inner workings and create applications for Solaris.

IBM's vice president of Linux, Scott Handy, said the Chiphopper program will greatly increase the number of applications in the Linux industry, or "ecosystem." The company intends to grow its catalog of approved applications from 6,000 today to 12,000 by the end of 2007.

"Sun is promoting an ecosystem that is one 20th the size of the Linux ecosystem," Handy said. "With this announcement, the business decision of which ecosystem is the better business opportunity just got easier, and it heavily favors Linux."


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: linux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2005 4:53:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce


2 posted on 02/14/2005 4:53:36 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Linux industry, or "ecosystem."
OK, they can take me away now, I've heard it all. Ecosystem?
3 posted on 02/14/2005 4:58:06 PM PST by ProudVet77 (rabid, right wing attack dog blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
IBM's vice president of Linux, Scott Handy, said the Chiphopper program will greatly increase the number of applications in the Linux industry, or "ecosystem."

Hmmm...ok.

I saw this:

"It's generally part of an effort to fight the perception, held in many quarters, that Linux is nothing more than an x86 phenomenon," said Stephen O'Grady, an analyst at RedMonk. "IBM wants to expand (application) vendors' horizons to non-x86 platforms."

And immediately thought about the new CELL chip IBM is building for SONY and Toshiba which is an incredible performer but for PC applications will need Software.

Details on the CELL are here:

IBM unveils 'supercomputer on a chip'

4 posted on 02/14/2005 5:04:51 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Linux is all right, for what it is, but I just don't get why someone like IBM wants to be so pushy with it, especially on the server side. We use their AIX product extensively, and we just can't get the same level of stability or mature tools on Linux, as a server solution, as we can on AIX.


5 posted on 02/14/2005 5:07:00 PM PST by SoDak (hoist that rag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
Linux is all right, for what it is, but I just don't get why someone like IBM wants to be so pushy with it, especially on the server side

Well, IBM actually has to pay people to write AIX.

6 posted on 02/14/2005 5:10:12 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

We pay IBM a lot for their trouble.


7 posted on 02/14/2005 5:13:54 PM PST by SoDak (hoist that rag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
There was always a problem at IBM (when I was a Field SE some years ago) of all the multiple operating systems, each having it's own development staff, support staff, Hdqrs and field.

Big bunches of money costs. IBM being a bottom line company, the high level was continually pushing to reduce the cost of all of this. So the rational could be nothing more than that.


But they do have a new processor coming....so maybe ....they have some plans. Of course the two events may not be connected also.
8 posted on 02/14/2005 5:14:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
We pay IBM a lot for their trouble.

Sure. But fundamentally IBM sells hardware and services, so they want software to be as cheap as possible. It's all about commoditizing your complements.

9 posted on 02/14/2005 5:18:40 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

AIX requires hardware AND support with high margins on both. Linux can be run on a plain jane Intel box. I don't know, maybe you're barking up the right tree, I'm often confused at IBM's decision-making, and also confused about the marketplace pushing Linux so hard, but I still highly value IBM's products.


10 posted on 02/14/2005 5:25:16 PM PST by SoDak (hoist that rag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
but I still highly value IBM's products.

As a shareholder I am glad to hear that.

11 posted on 02/14/2005 5:27:53 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I've slowly purged my company of Unisys, NCR, and SCO. I'd never consider anything other than AIX on risc for what we do.


12 posted on 02/14/2005 5:37:12 PM PST by SoDak (hoist that rag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

IBM Ping


13 posted on 02/15/2005 5:30:42 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
I'd never consider anything other than AIX on risc for what we do.

Too bad for you, that plans like this are perfect proof IBM plans to shelve AIX in favor of the foreign fake Linux. Disappointing to me, too.

14 posted on 02/15/2005 5:34:23 AM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

It's really no mystery. It's about moving application software, which is where the biggest margins are. Intel hardware has been effectively commoditized, now IBM is now trying to commoditize OS as well as high-end hardware.


15 posted on 02/15/2005 6:13:50 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

You and me both!


16 posted on 02/15/2005 6:16:23 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Linux may be (partially) foreign, but it's real. Show me evidence that China is using Linux to gain competative advantage and subvert US markets, and you'll have an ally in me.


17 posted on 02/15/2005 6:16:47 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200501/19/eng20050119_171084.html


18 posted on 02/15/2005 9:20:09 AM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

I'm not touching that through the corporate firewall, so I'll have a look at that when I get home this evening.


19 posted on 02/15/2005 10:28:42 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

That processor with 8 little vector units just looks an incredible performer for the right applications.

It might blow away some of the early Cray's.


20 posted on 02/15/2005 10:33:07 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson