Here is an example of what I would call a good exchange between an evolutionist and someone who has major criticisms and an alternative idea. I don't think either guy is an idiot, a charlatan, a bufoon or a liar. They are coming from different perspectives and having what looks for all the world like an honest debate. Eeeegads, imagine that.
http://home.wxs.nl/~gkorthof/kortho36a.htm
And for the record he makes no bones about it, he is a creationist in the sense that he believes God created the universe.
PS: Korthof is a sharp guy as well.
yea, so? I just wasted a perfectly good 20 minutes reading this and I don't find a single idea or argument I haven't seen 100 times here, expept usually with a great deal more actual evidence rolled into the discussion. If there's a point or two in here you want to argue about, please do so. If not, I fail to see the point.