To: Stoat
Actually, this is different from "when SUVs attack" stories, in that the article states: "The driver of a sport utility vehicle", "The man behind the wheel drove the SUV" and "The driver of the SUV" -- it actually blames the driver, not the SUV, a fairly rare occurrence these days.
4 posted on
01/24/2005 2:17:34 PM PST by
kevkrom
(If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
To: kevkrom
Not quite -- look at the headline!
6 posted on
01/24/2005 2:21:54 PM PST by
expatpat
To: kevkrom
Well its been going on long enough that a really interesting headline might read: Volvo Swerves into Cornfield or Alternate Fuel Vehicle Slams into Credit Union or Hybrid Tech Car Rolls Over on Freeway.
7 posted on
01/24/2005 2:23:16 PM PST by
carumba
To: kevkrom
Actually, this is different from "when SUVs attack" stories, in that the article states: "The driver of a sport utility vehicle", "The man behind the wheel drove the SUV" and "The driver of the SUV" -- it actually blames the driver, not the SUV, a fairly rare occurrence these days. Although I agree that the mention of the driver is most likely an oversight on the part of the 'reporter' who is likely suffering a reprimand as a result of this inclusion, I would suggest that due to the fact that the headline clearly places blame upon the SUV, we can infer that the writer meant to lay the blame on the SUV entirely and we shouldn't discount the article as being in the "When SUV's Attack" series.
According to the Left, intentions are everything and therefore it's essential that we lay blame exclusively upon the SUV and not the driver, as the headline urges us to :-)
8 posted on
01/24/2005 2:23:23 PM PST by
Stoat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson